Difference between revisions of "Jobs/M2 DV 2014 conception-dsl"

From LRDE

 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
{{Job
 
{{Job
 
|Reference id=M2 DV 2014 conception-dsl
 
|Reference id=M2 DV 2014 conception-dsl
|Title=Lisp for the design and the development of DSLs.
+
|Title=Lisp for the design and the development of DSLs
 
|Dates=5 - 6 months in 2014
 
|Dates=5 - 6 months in 2014
 
|Research field=Dynamic Languages
 
|Research field=Dynamic Languages
 
|Related project=Climb
 
|Related project=Climb
 
|Advisor=Didier Verna
 
|Advisor=Didier Verna
|Context=Internship rather development / research oriented.
 
 
|Prerequisites=Skills in functional programming are essential. Prior knowledge of Lisp, Haskell and/or Scala would help.
 
|Prerequisites=Skills in functional programming are essential. Prior knowledge of Lisp, Haskell and/or Scala would help.
|Objectives=The design and implementation of DSLs are booming. There are many approaches to this problem, one is about using the extensibility capabilities of a general programming language in order to meet specific requirements. Many multi-paradigm approaches (eg functional languages / meta-programming while compiling) also offer benefits. Lisp is a language that is particularly well suited for this type of problem, but it is almost totally absent from the literature on DSLs. Indeed, most researchers are not (or not anymore) familiar with this language. They prefer a language based on a static approach, or have simply forgotten everything Lisp is capable of.
+
|Objectives=DSL design and implementation is booming. There are many approaches to this problem, one is about using the extensibility capabilities of a general-purpose programming language in order to meet specific requirements. Many multi-paradigm approaches (eg functional languages / compile-time meta-programming) also offer benefits. Lisp is a language that is particularly well suited for this type of problem, but it is almost totally absent from the literature on DSLs. Indeed, most researchers are not (or not anymore) familiar with this language. They prefer a language based on a static approach, or have simply forgotten everything Lisp is capable of.
The purpose of this internship is to (begin to) fill the gap by adding Lisp to the comparative literature. The work will consist in the study of literature demonstrating some useful approaches for the design of DSLs, further it should propose an alternative approach with Lisp and then compare the results. The steps of this training will include: (i ) Familiarization with Common Lisp and in particular its extensibility capabilities. (ii) Making contact with the literature on the design and implementation of DSLs in other languages. (iii ) Choice of an application-centric approach or a comparative approach based on this literature and implementation of a Lispish equivalent. (iv) Finally, analysis of the results following the aspects such as: ease of implementation, expressiveness, performance etc. .
+
The purpose of this internship is to (begin to) fill the gap by adding Lisp to the comparative literature. The work will consist in the study of literature demonstrating some useful approaches for the design of DSLs, further it should propose an alternative approach with Lisp and then compare the results. The steps of this training will include: (i ) Familiarization with Common Lisp and in particular its extensibility capabilities. (ii) Getting acquainted with the literature on the design and implementation of DSLs in other languages. (iii ) Choice of an application-centric approach or a comparative approach based on this literature and implementation of a Lispish equivalent. (iv) Finally, analysis of the results following the aspects such as: ease of implementation, expressiveness, performance etc. .
 
|Benefit for the candidate=Familiarization with multiple programming languages​​, including Lisp, Haskell and Scala. Experience in the field of DSLs (Domain Specific Languages​​).
 
|Benefit for the candidate=Familiarization with multiple programming languages​​, including Lisp, Haskell and Scala. Experience in the field of DSLs (Domain Specific Languages​​).
 
|Contact=didier@lrde.epita.fr
 
|Contact=didier@lrde.epita.fr
 
|Compensation=800€ euros gross/month
 
|Compensation=800€ euros gross/month
|Future work opportunities= If you have performed the internship satisfactorily, we would like it to be followed by a PhD thesis.
+
|Future work opportunities=If you have performed the internship satisfactorily, we would like it to be followed by a PhD thesis.
 
|Type=Master Internship
 
|Type=Master Internship
 
|Language=en
 
|Language=en
 
|Context=Internship rather development / research oriented.
 
}}
 
}}

Latest revision as of 16:38, 29 October 2014

Lisp for the design and the development of DSLs
Reference id

M2 DV 2014 conception-dsl

Dates

5 - 6 months in 2014

Research field

Dynamic Languages

Related project

Climb

Advisor

Didier Verna

General presentation of the field
Prerequisites

Skills in functional programming are essential. Prior knowledge of Lisp, Haskell and/or Scala would help.

Objectives

DSL design and implementation is booming. There are many approaches to this problem, one is about using the extensibility capabilities of a general-purpose programming language in order to meet specific requirements. Many multi-paradigm approaches (eg functional languages / compile-time meta-programming) also offer benefits. Lisp is a language that is particularly well suited for this type of problem, but it is almost totally absent from the literature on DSLs. Indeed, most researchers are not (or not anymore) familiar with this language. They prefer a language based on a static approach, or have simply forgotten everything Lisp is capable of. The purpose of this internship is to (begin to) fill the gap by adding Lisp to the comparative literature. The work will consist in the study of literature demonstrating some useful approaches for the design of DSLs, further it should propose an alternative approach with Lisp and then compare the results. The steps of this training will include: (i ) Familiarization with Common Lisp and in particular its extensibility capabilities. (ii) Getting acquainted with the literature on the design and implementation of DSLs in other languages. (iii ) Choice of an application-centric approach or a comparative approach based on this literature and implementation of a Lispish equivalent. (iv) Finally, analysis of the results following the aspects such as: ease of implementation, expressiveness, performance etc. .

Benefit for the candidate

Familiarization with multiple programming languages​​, including Lisp, Haskell and Scala. Experience in the field of DSLs (Domain Specific Languages​​).

References
Place LRDE: How to get to us
Compensation

800€ euros gross/month

Future work opportunities

If you have performed the internship satisfactorily, we would like it to be followed by a PhD thesis.

Contact

didier@lrde.epita.fr