Difference between revisions of "Publications/gbaguidiaisse.18.seminar"

From LRDE

(Created page with "{{CSIReport | authors = Alexandre Gbaguidi Aïsse | title = Deciding Persistence or Recurrence Membership in Spot | year = 2018 | number = 1801 | abstract = There is a hierarc...")
 
Line 4: Line 4:
 
| year = 2018
 
| year = 2018
 
| number = 1801
 
| number = 1801
| abstract = There is a hierarchy of temporal properties, defined by Manna and Pnueli (1990). This hierarchy contains, amongst others, the recurrence and persistence classes. Knowing that a formula of linear time temporal logic (LTL) <math>f</math> is recurrent (respectively persistent) is interesting because it ensures that <math>f</math> can be translated into a deterministic Büchi automaton (respectively into a co-Büchi automaton). Originally, Spot, a library for <math>\omega</math>-automata manipulation, had a single way to decide if a linear temporal logic formula belongs to the recurrence or to the persistence class. Thanks to our previous work introduced in emphA co-Büching Toolbox
+
| abstract = There is a hierarchy of temporal properties, defined by Manna and Pnueli (1990). This hierarchy contains, amongst others, the recurrence and persistence classes. Knowing that a formula of linear time temporal logic (LTL) {{#tag:math|f}} is recurrent (respectively persistent) is interesting because it ensures that <math>f</math> can be translated into a deterministic Büchi automaton (respectively into a co-Büchi automaton). Originally, Spot, a library for <math>\omega</math>-automata manipulation, had a single way to decide if a linear temporal logic formula belongs to the recurrence or to the persistence class. Thanks to our previous work introduced in emphA co-Büching Toolbox
 
| type = techreport
 
| type = techreport
 
| id = gbaguidiaisse.18.seminar
 
| id = gbaguidiaisse.18.seminar

Revision as of 19:10, 29 January 2018

Abstract

There is a hierarchy of temporal properties, defined by Manna and Pnueli (1990). This hierarchy contains, amongst others, the recurrence and persistence classes. Knowing that a formula of linear time temporal logic (LTL) is recurrent (respectively persistent) is interesting because it ensures that can be translated into a deterministic Büchi automaton (respectively into a co-Büchi automaton). Originally, Spot, a library for -automata manipulation, had a single way to decide if a linear temporal logic formula belongs to the recurrence or to the persistence class. Thanks to our previous work introduced in emphA co-Büching Toolbox