Difference between revisions of "Publications/renault.13.tacas"
From LRDE
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
| booktitle = Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Tools and Algorithms for the Construction and Analysis of Systems (TACAS'13) |
| booktitle = Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Tools and Algorithms for the Construction and Analysis of Systems (TACAS'13) |
||
| editors = Nir Piterman, Scott A Smolka |
| editors = Nir Piterman, Scott A Smolka |
||
− | | pages = |
+ | | pages = 580 to 593 |
| publisher = Springer |
| publisher = Springer |
||
| series = Lecture Notes in Computer Science |
| series = Lecture Notes in Computer Science |
||
Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
| type = inproceedings |
| type = inproceedings |
||
| id = renault.13.tacas |
| id = renault.13.tacas |
||
+ | | identifier = doi:10.1007/978-3-642-36742-7_42 |
||
| bibtex = |
| bibtex = |
||
@InProceedings<nowiki>{</nowiki> renault.13.tacas, |
@InProceedings<nowiki>{</nowiki> renault.13.tacas, |
||
Line 49: | Line 50: | ||
can be used with any automata-based model checker. We |
can be used with any automata-based model checker. We |
||
illustrate the interest of this new approach using explicit |
illustrate the interest of this new approach using explicit |
||
− | and symbolic LTL model checkers.<nowiki>}</nowiki> |
+ | and symbolic LTL model checkers.<nowiki>}</nowiki>, |
+ | doi = <nowiki>{</nowiki>10.1007/978-3-642-36742-7_42<nowiki>}</nowiki> |
||
<nowiki>}</nowiki> |
<nowiki>}</nowiki> |
||
Latest revision as of 11:30, 1 April 2019
- Authors
- Etienne Renault, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, Fabrice Kordon, Denis Poitrenaud
- Where
- Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Tools and Algorithms for the Construction and Analysis of Systems (TACAS'13)
- Type
- inproceedings
- Publisher
- Springer
- Projects
- Spot
- Date
- 2013-01-08
Abstract
The automata-theoretic approach for model checking of linear-time temporal properties involves the emptiness check of a large Büchi automaton. Specialized emptiness-check algorithms have been proposed for the cases where the property is represented by a weak or terminal automaton. When the property automaton does not fall into these categories, a general emptiness check is required. This paper focuses on this class of properties. We refine previous approaches by classifying strongly-connected components rather than automata, and suggest a decomposition of the property automaton into three smaller automata capturing the terminal, weak, and the remaining strong behaviors of the property. The three corresponding emptiness checks can be performed independently, using the most appropriate algorithm. Such a decomposition approach can be used with any automata-based model checker. We illustrate the interest of this new approach using explicit and symbolic LTL model checkers.
Documents
Bibtex (lrde.bib)
@InProceedings{ renault.13.tacas, author = {Etienne Renault and Alexandre Duret-Lutz and Fabrice Kordon and Denis Poitrenaud}, title = {Strength-Based Decomposition of the Property {B\"u}chi Automaton for Faster Model Checking}, booktitle = {Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Tools and Algorithms for the Construction and Analysis of Systems (TACAS'13)}, editor = {Nir Piterman and Scott A. Smolka}, year = 2013, month = mar, pages = {580--593}, publisher = {Springer}, series = {Lecture Notes in Computer Science}, volume = 7795, abstract = {The automata-theoretic approach for model checking of linear-time temporal properties involves the emptiness check of a large B{\"u}chi automaton. Specialized emptiness-check algorithms have been proposed for the cases where the property is represented by a weak or terminal automaton. When the property automaton does not fall into these categories, a general emptiness check is required. This paper focuses on this class of properties. We refine previous approaches by classifying strongly-connected components rather than automata, and suggest a decomposition of the property automaton into three smaller automata capturing the terminal, weak, and the remaining strong behaviors of the property. The three corresponding emptiness checks can be performed independently, using the most appropriate algorithm. Such a decomposition approach can be used with any automata-based model checker. We illustrate the interest of this new approach using explicit and symbolic LTL model checkers.}, doi = {10.1007/978-3-642-36742-7_42} }