Difference between revisions of "Publications/renault.13.lpar"
From LRDE
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
| type = inproceedings |
| type = inproceedings |
||
| id = renault.13.lpar |
| id = renault.13.lpar |
||
+ | | identifier = doi:10.1007/978-3-642-45221-5_44 |
||
| bibtex = |
| bibtex = |
||
@InProceedings<nowiki>{</nowiki> renault.13.lpar, |
@InProceedings<nowiki>{</nowiki> renault.13.lpar, |
||
Line 49: | Line 50: | ||
induced by the emptiness check compared to the |
induced by the emptiness check compared to the |
||
corresponding SCCs enumeration algorithm. Our experiments |
corresponding SCCs enumeration algorithm. Our experiments |
||
− | shows that these three algorithms are comparable.<nowiki>}</nowiki> |
+ | shows that these three algorithms are comparable.<nowiki>}</nowiki>, |
+ | doi = <nowiki>{</nowiki>10.1007/978-3-642-45221-5_44<nowiki>}</nowiki> |
||
<nowiki>}</nowiki> |
<nowiki>}</nowiki> |
||
Latest revision as of 11:30, 1 April 2019
- Authors
- Etienne Renault, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, Fabrice Kordon, Denis Poitrenaud
- Where
- Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Logic for Programming, Artificial Intelligence, and Reasoning (LPAR'13)
- Type
- inproceedings
- Publisher
- Springer
- Date
- 2013-10-09
Abstract
The automata-theoretic approach for the verification of linear time properties involves checking the emptiness of a Büchi automaton. However generalized Büchi automata, with multiple acceptance sets, are preferred when verifying under weak fairness hypotheses. Existing emptiness checks for which the complexity is independent of the number of acceptance sets are all based on the enumeration of Strongly Connected Components (SCCs). In this paper, we review the state of the art SCC enumeration algorithms to study how they can be turned into emptiness checks. This leads us to define two new emptiness check algorithms (one of them based on the Union Find data structure), introduce new optimizations, and show that one of these can be of benefit to a classic SCCs enumeration algorithm. We have implemented all these variants to compare their relative performances and the overhead induced by the emptiness check compared to the corresponding SCCs enumeration algorithm. Our experiments shows that these three algorithms are comparable.
Documents
Bibtex (lrde.bib)
@InProceedings{ renault.13.lpar, author = {Etienne Renault and Alexandre Duret-Lutz and Fabrice Kordon and Denis Poitrenaud}, title = {Three {SCC}-based Emptiness Checks for Generalized {B\"u}chi Automata}, booktitle = {Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Logic for Programming, Artificial Intelligence, and Reasoning (LPAR'13)}, editor = {Ken McMillan and Aart Middeldorp and Andrei Voronkov }, year = 2013, month = dec, pages = {668--682}, publisher = {Springer}, series = {Lecture Notes in Computer Science}, volume = 8312, abstract = {The automata-theoretic approach for the verification of linear time properties involves checking the emptiness of a B{\"u}chi automaton. However generalized B{\"u}chi automata, with multiple acceptance sets, are preferred when verifying under weak fairness hypotheses. Existing emptiness checks for which the complexity is independent of the number of acceptance sets are all based on the enumeration of Strongly Connected Components (SCCs). In this paper, we review the state of the art SCC enumeration algorithms to study how they can be turned into emptiness checks. This leads us to define two new emptiness check algorithms (one of them based on the Union Find data structure), introduce new optimizations, and show that one of these can be of benefit to a classic SCCs enumeration algorithm. We have implemented all these variants to compare their relative performances and the overhead induced by the emptiness check compared to the corresponding SCCs enumeration algorithm. Our experiments shows that these three algorithms are comparable.}, doi = {10.1007/978-3-642-45221-5_44} }