Difference between revisions of "Publications/bensalem.14.tacas"
From LRDE
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
| pages = 440 to 454 |
| pages = 440 to 454 |
||
| address = Grenoble, France |
| address = Grenoble, France |
||
− | | abstract = In a previous work, we showed that a kind of |
+ | | abstract = In a previous work, we showed that a kind of <math>\omega</math>-automata known as emphTransition-based Generalized Testing Automata (TGTA) can outperform the Büchi automata traditionally used for explicit model checking when verifying stutter-invariant properties. In this work, we investigate the use of these generalized testing automata to improve symbolic model checking of stutter-invariant LTL properties. We propose an efficient symbolic encoding of stuttering transitions in the product between a model and a TGTA. Saturation techniques available for decision diagrams then benefit from the presence of stuttering self-loops on all states of TGTA. Experimentation of this approach confirms that it outperforms the symbolic approach based on (transition-based) Generalized Büchi Automata. |
| lrdepaper = http://www.lrde.epita.fr/dload/papers/bensalem.14.tacas.pdf |
| lrdepaper = http://www.lrde.epita.fr/dload/papers/bensalem.14.tacas.pdf |
||
| lrdeprojects = Spot |
| lrdeprojects = Spot |
||
| type = inproceedings |
| type = inproceedings |
||
| id = bensalem.14.tacas |
| id = bensalem.14.tacas |
||
+ | | identifier = doi:10.1007/978-3-642-54862-8_38 |
||
| bibtex = |
| bibtex = |
||
@InProceedings<nowiki>{</nowiki> bensalem.14.tacas, |
@InProceedings<nowiki>{</nowiki> bensalem.14.tacas, |
||
Line 26: | Line 27: | ||
year = 2014, |
year = 2014, |
||
publisher = <nowiki>{</nowiki>Springer<nowiki>}</nowiki>, |
publisher = <nowiki>{</nowiki>Springer<nowiki>}</nowiki>, |
||
+ | doi = <nowiki>{</nowiki>10.1007/978-3-642-54862-8_38<nowiki>}</nowiki>, |
||
series = <nowiki>{</nowiki>Lecture Notes in Computer Science<nowiki>}</nowiki>, |
series = <nowiki>{</nowiki>Lecture Notes in Computer Science<nowiki>}</nowiki>, |
||
volume = 8413, |
volume = 8413, |
Latest revision as of 11:29, 1 April 2019
- Authors
- Ala Eddine Ben Salem, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, Fabrice Kordon, Yann Thierry-Mieg
- Where
- Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Tools and Algorithms for the Construction and Analysis of Systems (TACAS'14)
- Place
- Grenoble, France
- Type
- inproceedings
- Publisher
- Springer
- Projects
- Spot
- Date
- 2014-04-01
Abstract
In a previous work, we showed that a kind of -automata known as emphTransition-based Generalized Testing Automata (TGTA) can outperform the Büchi automata traditionally used for explicit model checking when verifying stutter-invariant properties. In this work, we investigate the use of these generalized testing automata to improve symbolic model checking of stutter-invariant LTL properties. We propose an efficient symbolic encoding of stuttering transitions in the product between a model and a TGTA. Saturation techniques available for decision diagrams then benefit from the presence of stuttering self-loops on all states of TGTA. Experimentation of this approach confirms that it outperforms the symbolic approach based on (transition-based) Generalized Büchi Automata.
Documents
Bibtex (lrde.bib)
@InProceedings{ bensalem.14.tacas, author = {Ala Eddine Ben{ S}alem and Alexandre Duret-Lutz and Fabrice Kordon and Yann Thierry-Mieg}, title = {Symbolic Model Checking of Stutter Invariant Properties Using Generalized Testing Automata}, booktitle = {Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Tools and Algorithms for the Construction and Analysis of Systems (TACAS'14)}, year = 2014, publisher = {Springer}, doi = {10.1007/978-3-642-54862-8_38}, series = {Lecture Notes in Computer Science}, volume = 8413, pages = {440--454}, address = {Grenoble, France}, month = apr, abstract = {In a previous work, we showed that a kind of $\omega$-automata known as \emph{Tran\-sition-based Generalized Testing Automata} (TGTA) can outperform the B\"uchi automata traditionally used for \textit{explicit} model checking when verifying stutter-invariant properties. In this work, we investigate the use of these generalized testing automata to improve \textit{symbolic} model checking of stutter-invariant LTL properties. We propose an efficient symbolic encoding of stuttering transitions in the product between a model and a TGTA. Saturation techniques available for decision diagrams then benefit from the presence of stuttering self-loops on all states of TGTA. Experimentation of this approach confirms that it outperforms the symbolic approach based on (transition-based) Generalized B\"uchi Automata.} }