Difference between revisions of "Publications/bensalem.14.tacas"
From LRDE
Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
| note = Accepted |
| note = Accepted |
||
| urllrde = 2014-TACAS |
| urllrde = 2014-TACAS |
||
− | | abstract = In a previous work, we showed that a kind of ω-automata known as emphTransition-based Generalized Testing Automata (TGTA) can outperform the Büchi automata traditionally used for explicit model checking when verifying stutter-invariant properties. In this work, we investigate the use of these generalized testing automata to improve symbolic model checking of stutter-invariant LTL properties. We propose an efficient symbolic encoding of stuttering transitions in the product between a model and a TGTA. Saturation techniques available for decision diagrams then benefit from the presence of stuttering self-loops on all states of TGTA. Experimentation of this approach confirms that it outperforms the symbolic approach based on (transition-based) Generalized B ̈uchi Automata. |
+ | | abstract = In a previous work, we showed that a kind of ω-automata known as emphTransition-based Generalized Testing Automata (TGTA) can outperform the Büchi automata traditionally used for explicit model checking when verifying stutter-invariant properties. In this work, we investigate the use of these generalized testing automata to improve symbolic model checking of stutter-invariant LTL properties. We propose an efficient symbolic encoding of stuttering transitions in the product between a model and a TGTA. Saturation techniques available for decision diagrams then benefit from the presence of stuttering self-loops on all states of TGTA. Experimentation of this approach confirms that it outperforms the symbolic approach based on (transition-based) Generalized B ̈uchi Automata. |
| lrdepaper = http://www.lrde.epita.fr/dload/papers/bensalem.14.tacas.pdf |
| lrdepaper = http://www.lrde.epita.fr/dload/papers/bensalem.14.tacas.pdf |
||
| lrdeprojects = Spot |
| lrdeprojects = Spot |
||
Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
publisher = <nowiki>{</nowiki>Springer<nowiki>}</nowiki>, |
publisher = <nowiki>{</nowiki>Springer<nowiki>}</nowiki>, |
||
series = <nowiki>{</nowiki>Lecture Notes in Computer Science<nowiki>}</nowiki>, |
series = <nowiki>{</nowiki>Lecture Notes in Computer Science<nowiki>}</nowiki>, |
||
− | volume = |
+ | volume = 8413, |
pages = <nowiki>{</nowiki>440--454<nowiki>}</nowiki>, |
pages = <nowiki>{</nowiki>440--454<nowiki>}</nowiki>, |
||
address = <nowiki>{</nowiki>Grenoble, France<nowiki>}</nowiki>, |
address = <nowiki>{</nowiki>Grenoble, France<nowiki>}</nowiki>, |
Revision as of 09:00, 25 June 2014
- Authors
- Ala Eddine Ben Salem, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, Fabrice Kordon, Yann Thierry-Mieg
- Where
- Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Tools and Algorithms for the Construction and Analysis of Systems (TACAS'14)
- Place
- Grenoble, France
- Type
- inproceedings
- Publisher
- Springer
- Projects
- Spot
- Date
- 2014-04-01
Abstract
In a previous work, we showed that a kind of ω-automata known as emphTransition-based Generalized Testing Automata (TGTA) can outperform the Büchi automata traditionally used for explicit model checking when verifying stutter-invariant properties. In this work, we investigate the use of these generalized testing automata to improve symbolic model checking of stutter-invariant LTL properties. We propose an efficient symbolic encoding of stuttering transitions in the product between a model and a TGTA. Saturation techniques available for decision diagrams then benefit from the presence of stuttering self-loops on all states of TGTA. Experimentation of this approach confirms that it outperforms the symbolic approach based on (transition-based) Generalized B ̈uchi Automata.
Documents
Bibtex (lrde.bib)
@InProceedings{ bensalem.14.tacas, author = {Ala Eddine Ben{ S}alem and Alexandre Duret-Lutz and Fabrice Kordon and Yann Thierry-Mieg}, title = {Symbolic Model Checking of Stutter Invariant Properties Using Generalized Testing Automata}, booktitle = {Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Tools and Algorithms for the Construction and Analysis of Systems (TACAS'14)}, year = 2014, publisher = {Springer}, series = {Lecture Notes in Computer Science}, volume = 8413, pages = {440--454}, address = {Grenoble, France}, month = apr, note = {Accepted}, abstract = {In a previous work, we showed that a kind of $\omega$-automata known as \emph{Tran\-sition-based Generalized Testing Automata} (TGTA) can outperform the Büchi automata traditionally used for \textit{explicit} model checking when verifying stutter-invariant properties. In this work, we investigate the use of these generalized testing automata to improve \textit{symbolic} model checking of stutter-invariant LTL properties. We propose an efficient symbolic encoding of stuttering transitions in the product between a model and a TGTA. Saturation techniques available for decision diagrams then benefit from the presence of stuttering self-loops on all states of TGTA. Experimentation of this approach confirms that it outperforms the symbolic approach based on (transition-based) Generalized B\ ̈uchi Automata.} }