Difference between revisions of "Publications/bensalem.14.tacas"

From LRDE

Line 12: Line 12:
 
| note = Accepted
 
| note = Accepted
 
| urllrde = 2014-TACAS
 
| urllrde = 2014-TACAS
| abstract = In a previous work, we showed that a kind of ω-automata known as emphTran­sition-based Generalized Testing Automata (TGTA) can outperform the Büchi automata traditionally used for explicit model checking when verifying stutter-invariant properties. In this work, we investigate the use of these generalized testing automata to improve symbolic model checking of stutter-invariant LTL properties. We propose an efficient symbolic encoding of stuttering transitions in the product between a model and a TGTA. Saturation techniques available for decision diagrams then benefit from the presence of stuttering self-loops on all states of TGTA. Experimentation of this approach confirms that it outperforms the symbolic approach based on (transition-based) Generalized B ̈uchi Automata.
+
| abstract = In a previous work, we showed that a kind of ω-automata known as emphTran­sition-based Generalized Testing Automata (TGTA) can outperform the Büchi automata traditionally used for explicit model checking when verifying stutter-invariant properties. In this work, we investigate the use of these generalized testing automata to improve symbolic model checking of stutter-invariant LTL properties. We propose an efficient symbolic encoding of stuttering transitions in the product between a model and a TGTA. Saturation techniques available for decision diagrams then benefit from the presence of stuttering self-loops on all states of TGTA. Experimentation of this approach confirms that it outperforms the symbolic approach based on (transition-based) Generalized B ̈uchi Automata.
 
| lrdepaper = http://www.lrde.epita.fr/dload/papers/bensalem.14.tacas.pdf
 
| lrdepaper = http://www.lrde.epita.fr/dload/papers/bensalem.14.tacas.pdf
 
| lrdeprojects = Spot
 
| lrdeprojects = Spot
Line 29: Line 29:
 
publisher = <nowiki>{</nowiki>Springer<nowiki>}</nowiki>,
 
publisher = <nowiki>{</nowiki>Springer<nowiki>}</nowiki>,
 
series = <nowiki>{</nowiki>Lecture Notes in Computer Science<nowiki>}</nowiki>,
 
series = <nowiki>{</nowiki>Lecture Notes in Computer Science<nowiki>}</nowiki>,
volume = <nowiki>{</nowiki>8413<nowiki>}</nowiki>,
+
volume = 8413,
 
pages = <nowiki>{</nowiki>440--454<nowiki>}</nowiki>,
 
pages = <nowiki>{</nowiki>440--454<nowiki>}</nowiki>,
 
address = <nowiki>{</nowiki>Grenoble, France<nowiki>}</nowiki>,
 
address = <nowiki>{</nowiki>Grenoble, France<nowiki>}</nowiki>,

Revision as of 09:00, 25 June 2014

Abstract

In a previous work, we showed that a kind of ω-automata known as emphTran­sition-based Generalized Testing Automata (TGTA) can outperform the Büchi automata traditionally used for explicit model checking when verifying stutter-invariant properties. In this work, we investigate the use of these generalized testing automata to improve symbolic model checking of stutter-invariant LTL properties. We propose an efficient symbolic encoding of stuttering transitions in the product between a model and a TGTA. Saturation techniques available for decision diagrams then benefit from the presence of stuttering self-loops on all states of TGTA. Experimentation of this approach confirms that it outperforms the symbolic approach based on (transition-based) Generalized B ̈uchi Automata.

Documents

Bibtex (lrde.bib)

@InProceedings{	  bensalem.14.tacas,
  author	= {Ala Eddine Ben{ S}alem and Alexandre Duret-Lutz and
		  Fabrice Kordon and Yann Thierry-Mieg},
  title		= {Symbolic Model Checking of Stutter Invariant Properties
		  Using Generalized Testing Automata},
  booktitle	= {Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Tools
		  and Algorithms for the Construction and Analysis of Systems
		  (TACAS'14)},
  year		= 2014,
  publisher	= {Springer},
  series	= {Lecture Notes in Computer Science},
  volume	= 8413,
  pages		= {440--454},
  address	= {Grenoble, France},
  month		= apr,
  note		= {Accepted},
  abstract	= {In a previous work, we showed that a kind of
		  $\omega$-automata known as \emph{Tran\-sition-based
		  Generalized Testing Automata} (TGTA) can outperform the
		  Büchi automata traditionally used for \textit{explicit}
		  model checking when verifying stutter-invariant properties.
		  In this work, we investigate the use of these generalized
		  testing automata to improve \textit{symbolic} model
		  checking of stutter-invariant LTL properties. We propose an
		  efficient symbolic encoding of stuttering transitions in
		  the product between a model and a TGTA. Saturation
		  techniques available for decision diagrams then benefit
		  from the presence of stuttering self-loops on all states of
		  TGTA. Experimentation of this approach confirms that it
		  outperforms the symbolic approach based on
		  (transition-based) Generalized B\ ̈uchi Automata.}
}