Difference between revisions of "Publications/bensalem.14.tacas"

From LRDE

(Created page with "{{Publication | published = true | date = 2014-01-01 | authors = Ala Eddine Ben Salem, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, Fabrice Kordon, Yann Thierry-Mieg | title = Symbolic Model Checkin...")
 
Line 10: Line 10:
 
| pages = to be published
 
| pages = to be published
 
| address = Grenoble, France
 
| address = Grenoble, France
| note = Accepted urllrde = 2014-TACAS
+
| note = Accepted
  +
| urllrde = 2014-TACAS
 
| abstract = In a previous work, we showed that a kind of ω-automata known as Tran­sition-based Generalized Testing Automata (TGTA) can outperform the Büchi automata traditionally used for explicit model checking when verifying stutter-invariant properties. In this work, we investigate the use of these generalized testing automata to improve symbolic model checking of stutter-invariant LTL properties. We propose an efficient symbolic encoding of stuttering transitions in the product between a model and a TGTA. Saturation techniques available for decision diagrams then benefit from the presence of stuttering self-loops on all states of TGTA. Experimentation of this approach confirms that it outperforms the symbolic approach based on (transition-based) Generalized B ̈uchi Automata.
 
| abstract = In a previous work, we showed that a kind of ω-automata known as Tran­sition-based Generalized Testing Automata (TGTA) can outperform the Büchi automata traditionally used for explicit model checking when verifying stutter-invariant properties. In this work, we investigate the use of these generalized testing automata to improve symbolic model checking of stutter-invariant LTL properties. We propose an efficient symbolic encoding of stuttering transitions in the product between a model and a TGTA. Saturation techniques available for decision diagrams then benefit from the presence of stuttering self-loops on all states of TGTA. Experimentation of this approach confirms that it outperforms the symbolic approach based on (transition-based) Generalized B ̈uchi Automata.
 
| lrdepaper = http://www.lrde.epita.fr/dload/papers/bensalem.14.tacas.pdf
 
| lrdepaper = http://www.lrde.epita.fr/dload/papers/bensalem.14.tacas.pdf

Revision as of 10:00, 29 January 2014

Abstract

In a previous work, we showed that a kind of ω-automata known as Tran­sition-based Generalized Testing Automata (TGTA) can outperform the Büchi automata traditionally used for explicit model checking when verifying stutter-invariant properties. In this work, we investigate the use of these generalized testing automata to improve symbolic model checking of stutter-invariant LTL properties. We propose an efficient symbolic encoding of stuttering transitions in the product between a model and a TGTA. Saturation techniques available for decision diagrams then benefit from the presence of stuttering self-loops on all states of TGTA. Experimentation of this approach confirms that it outperforms the symbolic approach based on (transition-based) Generalized B ̈uchi Automata.

Documents

Bibtex (lrde.bib)

@InProceedings{	  bensalem.14.tacas,
  author	= {Ala Eddine Ben{ S}alem and Alexandre Duret-Lutz and
		  Fabrice Kordon and Yann Thierry-Mieg},
  title		= {{Symbolic Model Checking of Stutter Invariant Properties
		  Using Generalized Testing Automata}},
  booktitle	= {{20th International Conference on Tools and Algorithms for
		  the Construction and Analysis of Systems (TACAS)}},
  year		= {2014},
  publisher	= {Springer},
  series	= {Lecture Notes in Computer Science},
  volume	= {?},
  pages		= {to be published},
  address	= {Grenoble, France},
  month		= {April},
  note		= {Accepted},
  abstract	= {In a previous work, we showed that a kind of
		  $\omega$-automata known as \emph{Tran\-sition-based
		  Generalized Testing Automata} (TGTA) can outperform the
		  Büchi automata traditionally used for \textit{explicit}
		  model checking when verifying stutter-invariant properties.
		  In this work, we investigate the use of these generalized
		  testing automata to improve \textit{symbolic} model
		  checking of stutter-invariant LTL properties. We propose an
		  efficient symbolic encoding of stuttering transitions in
		  the product between a model and a TGTA. Saturation
		  techniques available for decision diagrams then benefit
		  from the presence of stuttering self-loops on all states of
		  TGTA. Experimentation of this approach confirms that it
		  outperforms the symbolic approach based on
		  (transition-based) Generalized B\ ̈uchi Automata.}
}