Difference between revisions of "Publications/dehak.09.interspeechb"
From LRDE
(Created page with "{{Publication | date = 2009-06-22 | authors = Pierre Dumouchel, Najim Dehak, Yazid Attabi, Réda Dehak, Narjès Boufaden | title = Cepstral and Long-Term Features for Emotion ...") |
|||
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Publication |
{{Publication |
||
+ | | published = true |
||
| date = 2009-06-22 |
| date = 2009-06-22 |
||
| authors = Pierre Dumouchel, Najim Dehak, Yazid Attabi, Réda Dehak, Narjès Boufaden |
| authors = Pierre Dumouchel, Najim Dehak, Yazid Attabi, Réda Dehak, Narjès Boufaden |
||
Line 5: | Line 6: | ||
| booktitle = Interspeech |
| booktitle = Interspeech |
||
| note = Open Performance Sub-Challenge Prize |
| note = Open Performance Sub-Challenge Prize |
||
− | | urllrde = 200909-INTERSPEECH-A |
||
| abstract = In this paper, we describe systems that were developed for the Open Performance Sub-Challenge of the INTERSPEECH 2009 Emotion Challenge. We participate to both two-class and five-class emotion detection. For the two-class problemthe best performance is obtained by logistic regression fusion of three systems. Theses systems use short- and long-term speech features. This fusion achieved an absolute improvement of 2,6% on the unweighted recall value compared with [6]. For the five-class problem, we submitted two individual systems: cepstral GMM vs. long-term GMM-UBM. The best result comes from a cepstral GMM and produced an absolute improvement of 3,5% compared to [6]. |
| abstract = In this paper, we describe systems that were developed for the Open Performance Sub-Challenge of the INTERSPEECH 2009 Emotion Challenge. We participate to both two-class and five-class emotion detection. For the two-class problemthe best performance is obtained by logistic regression fusion of three systems. Theses systems use short- and long-term speech features. This fusion achieved an absolute improvement of 2,6% on the unweighted recall value compared with [6]. For the five-class problem, we submitted two individual systems: cepstral GMM vs. long-term GMM-UBM. The best result comes from a cepstral GMM and produced an absolute improvement of 3,5% compared to [6]. |
||
| lrdenewsdate = 2009-06-22 |
| lrdenewsdate = 2009-06-22 |
Latest revision as of 12:14, 26 April 2016
- Authors
- Pierre Dumouchel, Najim Dehak, Yazid Attabi, Réda Dehak, Narjès Boufaden
- Where
- Interspeech
- Type
- inproceedings
- Date
- 2009-06-22
Abstract
In this paper, we describe systems that were developed for the Open Performance Sub-Challenge of the INTERSPEECH 2009 Emotion Challenge. We participate to both two-class and five-class emotion detection. For the two-class problemthe best performance is obtained by logistic regression fusion of three systems. Theses systems use short- and long-term speech features. This fusion achieved an absolute improvement of 2,6% on the unweighted recall value compared with [6]. For the five-class problem, we submitted two individual systems: cepstral GMM vs. long-term GMM-UBM. The best result comes from a cepstral GMM and produced an absolute improvement of 3,5% compared to [6].
Bibtex (lrde.bib)
@InProceedings{ dehak.09.interspeechb, author = {Pierre Dumouchel and Najim Dehak and Yazid Attabi and R\'eda Dehak and Narj\`es Boufaden}, title = {Cepstral and Long-Term Features for Emotion Recognition}, booktitle = {Interspeech}, year = 2009, month = sep, note = {Open Performance Sub-Challenge Prize}, abstract = {In this paper, we describe systems that were developed for the Open Performance Sub-Challenge of the INTERSPEECH 2009 Emotion Challenge. We participate to both two-class and five-class emotion detection. For the two-class problem, the best performance is obtained by logistic regression fusion of three systems. Theses systems use short- and long-term speech features. This fusion achieved an absolute improvement of 2,6\% on the unweighted recall value compared with [6]. For the five-class problem, we submitted two individual systems: cepstral GMM vs. long-term GMM-UBM. The best result comes from a cepstral GMM and produced an absolute improvement of 3,5\% compared to [6].} }