Difference between revisions of "Publications/verna.13.tug-2"
From LRDE
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
| title = TiCL: the Prototype (Star TeX: the Next GenerationSeason 2) |
| title = TiCL: the Prototype (Star TeX: the Next GenerationSeason 2) |
||
| booktitle = TUGboat |
| booktitle = TUGboat |
||
| + | | nodoi = |
||
| editors = Barbara Beeton, Karl Berry |
| editors = Barbara Beeton, Karl Berry |
||
| volume = 34 |
| volume = 34 |
||
| Line 22: | Line 23: | ||
year = 2013, |
year = 2013, |
||
month = jan, |
month = jan, |
||
| + | nodoi = <nowiki>{</nowiki><nowiki>}</nowiki>, |
||
editor = <nowiki>{</nowiki>Barbara Beeton and Karl Berry<nowiki>}</nowiki>, |
editor = <nowiki>{</nowiki>Barbara Beeton and Karl Berry<nowiki>}</nowiki>, |
||
volume = 34, |
volume = 34, |
||
Latest revision as of 10:40, 22 April 2023
- Authors
- Didier Verna
- Where
- TUGboat
- Type
- inproceedings
- Projects
- Typesetting"Typesetting" is not in the list (Vaucanson, Spot, URBI, Olena, APMC, Tiger, Climb, Speaker ID, Transformers, Bison, ...) of allowed values for the "Related project" property.
- Date
- 2013-01-01
Abstract
At TUG 2012, we presented some ideas about using one of the oldest programming languages (Lisp), in order to modernize one of the oldest typesetting systems (TeX). This talk was mostly focused on justifying the technical fitness of Lisp for this task. This time, we would like to take the opposite view and demonstrate a prototype, from the user's perspective. This involves showing what a TiCL document could look like, the implications in terms of typesetting vs. programmatic features, and also in terms of extensibility (relate this to class / style authoring).
Documents
Bibtex (lrde.bib)
@InProceedings{ verna.13.tug-2,
author = {Didier Verna},
title = {{TiCL}: the Prototype ({Star \TeX}: the Next Generation,
Season 2) },
booktitle = {TUGboat},
issn = 0896320,
year = 2013,
month = jan,
nodoi = {},
editor = {Barbara Beeton and Karl Berry},
volume = 34,
number = 3,
abstract = {At TUG 2012, we presented some ideas about using one of
the oldest programming languages (Lisp), in order to
modernize one of the oldest typesetting systems (\TeX).
This talk was mostly focused on justifying the technical
fitness of Lisp for this task. This time, we would like to
take the opposite view and demonstrate a prototype, from
the user's perspective. This involves showing what a TiCL
document could look like, the implications in terms of
typesetting vs. programmatic features, and also in terms of
extensibility (relate this to class / style authoring). }
}