Difference between revisions of "Publications/newton.17.dtd.report"
From LRDE
(Created page with "{{Publication | published = true | date = 2016-11-17 | lrdekeywords = types, set theory, graph, lisp | lrdenewsdate = 2016-11-17 | lrdepaper = http://www.lrde.epita.fr/dload/p...") |
|||
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Publication |
{{Publication |
||
| published = true |
| published = true |
||
− | | date = |
+ | | date = 2017-02-02 |
| lrdekeywords = types, set theory, graph, lisp |
| lrdekeywords = types, set theory, graph, lisp |
||
− | | lrdenewsdate = |
+ | | lrdenewsdate = 2017-02-02 |
| lrdepaper = http://www.lrde.epita.fr/dload/papers/newton.17.dtd.report.pdf |
| lrdepaper = http://www.lrde.epita.fr/dload/papers/newton.17.dtd.report.pdf |
||
| lrdeprojects = Climb |
| lrdeprojects = Climb |
||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
| institution = LRDE |
| institution = LRDE |
||
| address = Paris, France |
| address = Paris, France |
||
− | | abstract = In this article we demonstrate 4 algorithms for calculating the maximal disjoint decomposition of a given set of types. |
+ | | abstract = In this article we demonstrate 4 algorithms for calculating the maximal disjoint decomposition of a given set of types. We discuss some advantages and disadvantages of each, and compare their performance. We extended currently known work to describe an efficient algorithm for manipulating binary decision diagrams representing types in a programming language which supports subtyping viewed as subsets. |
+ | | nodoi = |
||
| type = techreport |
| type = techreport |
||
| id = newton.17.dtd.report |
| id = newton.17.dtd.report |
||
Line 29: | Line 30: | ||
manipulating binary decision diagrams representing types in |
manipulating binary decision diagrams representing types in |
||
a programming language which supports subtyping viewed as |
a programming language which supports subtyping viewed as |
||
− | subsets.<nowiki>}</nowiki> |
+ | subsets.<nowiki>}</nowiki>, |
+ | nodoi = <nowiki>{</nowiki><nowiki>}</nowiki> |
||
<nowiki>}</nowiki> |
<nowiki>}</nowiki> |
||
Latest revision as of 19:08, 7 April 2023
- Authors
- Jim Newton
- Place
- Paris, France
- Type
- techreport
- Projects
- Climb
- Keywords
- types, set theory, graph, lisp
- Date
- 2017-02-02
Abstract
In this article we demonstrate 4 algorithms for calculating the maximal disjoint decomposition of a given set of types. We discuss some advantages and disadvantages of each, and compare their performance. We extended currently known work to describe an efficient algorithm for manipulating binary decision diagrams representing types in a programming language which supports subtyping viewed as subsets.
Documents
Bibtex (lrde.bib)
@TechReport{ newton.17.dtd.report, author = {Jim Newton}, title = {Analysis of Algorithms Calculating the Maximal Disjoint Decomposition of a Set}, institution = {LRDE}, year = 2017, address = {Paris, France}, month = jan, abstract = { In this article we demonstrate 4 algorithms for calculating the maximal disjoint decomposition of a given set of types. We discuss some advantages and disadvantages of each, and compare their performance. We extended currently known work to describe an efficient algorithm for manipulating binary decision diagrams representing types in a programming language which supports subtyping viewed as subsets.}, nodoi = {} }