Difference between revisions of "Publications/pouillard.05.sud"
From LRDE
(7 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Publication |
{{Publication |
||
+ | | published = false |
||
| date = 2005-05-01 |
| date = 2005-05-01 |
||
| authors = Akim Demaille, Thomas Largillier, Nicolas Pouillard |
| authors = Akim Demaille, Thomas Largillier, Nicolas Pouillard |
||
Line 5: | Line 6: | ||
| note = Communication to Stratego Users Day 2005 |
| note = Communication to Stratego Users Day 2005 |
||
| address = Utrecht University, Netherland |
| address = Utrecht University, Netherland |
||
− | | |
+ | | lrdeprojects = Transformers |
⚫ | | abstract = By the means on its annotations, Syntax Definition Formalism (SDF) seems to be extensible: the user is tempted to tailor its grammar syntax by adding new annotation kinds. Unfortunately the standard SDF crunching tools from Stratego/XT do not support the extension of SDF, and the user has to develop the whole set of tools for her home grown extension(s). We present the SDF tool set that provides “weak” genericity with respect to the grammar grammar: support for arbitrary SDF annotations. We would like to contribute it to Stratego/XT since its components subsume their stock peers. Finally, we present a set of four extensions we find useful. |
||
− | | urllrde = 200505-SUD-esdf |
||
⚫ | | abstract = By the means on its annotations, Syntax Definition Formalism (SDF) seems to be extensible: the user is tempted to tailor its grammar syntax by adding new annotation kinds. Unfortunately the standard SDF crunching tools from Stratego/XT do not support the extension of SDF, and the user has to develop the whole set of tools for her home grown extension(s). We present the SDF tool set that provides |
||
| lrdepaper = http://www.lrde.epita.fr/dload/200505-SUD/esdf/article-200505-SUD-esdf.pdf |
| lrdepaper = http://www.lrde.epita.fr/dload/200505-SUD/esdf/article-200505-SUD-esdf.pdf |
||
| type = misc |
| type = misc |
||
Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
address = <nowiki>{</nowiki>Utrecht <nowiki>{</nowiki>U<nowiki>}</nowiki>niversity, <nowiki>{</nowiki>N<nowiki>}</nowiki>etherland<nowiki>}</nowiki>, |
address = <nowiki>{</nowiki>Utrecht <nowiki>{</nowiki>U<nowiki>}</nowiki>niversity, <nowiki>{</nowiki>N<nowiki>}</nowiki>etherland<nowiki>}</nowiki>, |
||
month = may, |
month = may, |
||
− | project = <nowiki>{</nowiki>Transformers<nowiki>}</nowiki>, |
||
abstract = <nowiki>{</nowiki>By the means on its annotations, Syntax Definition |
abstract = <nowiki>{</nowiki>By the means on its annotations, Syntax Definition |
||
Formalism (SDF) seems to be extensible: the user is tempted |
Formalism (SDF) seems to be extensible: the user is tempted |
Latest revision as of 12:31, 12 November 2018
- Authors
- Akim Demaille, Thomas Largillier, Nicolas Pouillard
- Place
- Utrecht University, Netherland
- Type
- misc
- Projects
- Transformers
- Date
- 2005-05-01
Abstract
By the means on its annotations, Syntax Definition Formalism (SDF) seems to be extensible: the user is tempted to tailor its grammar syntax by adding new annotation kinds. Unfortunately the standard SDF crunching tools from Stratego/XT do not support the extension of SDF, and the user has to develop the whole set of tools for her home grown extension(s). We present the SDF tool set that provides “weak” genericity with respect to the grammar grammar: support for arbitrary SDF annotations. We would like to contribute it to Stratego/XT since its components subsume their stock peers. Finally, we present a set of four extensions we find useful.
Documents
Bibtex (lrde.bib)
@Misc{ pouillard.05.sud, author = {Akim Demaille and Thomas Largillier and Nicolas Pouillard}, title = {{ESDF}: A proposal for a more flexible {SDF} handling}, note = {Communication to Stratego Users Day 2005}, year = 2005, address = {Utrecht {U}niversity, {N}etherland}, month = may, abstract = {By the means on its annotations, Syntax Definition Formalism (SDF) seems to be extensible: the user is tempted to tailor its grammar syntax by adding new annotation kinds. Unfortunately the standard SDF crunching tools from Stratego/XT do not support the extension of SDF, and the user has to develop the whole set of tools for her home grown extension(s). We present the SDF tool set that provides ``weak'' genericity with respect to the grammar grammar: support for arbitrary SDF annotations. We would like to contribute it to Stratego/XT since its components subsume their stock peers. Finally, we present a set of four extensions we find useful.} }